<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329</id><updated>2012-01-30T04:25:33.306-08:00</updated><category term='Open Source Software'/><category term='Open Office vs MS Office'/><category term='Anti-virus'/><category term='Microsoft'/><category term='Firefox'/><category term='Microsoft Security'/><category term='FUD'/><category term='Linux'/><category term='security'/><category term='GIMP'/><category term='vulnerability'/><category term='Opera'/><category term='random thoughts'/><category term='Internet Explorer'/><category term='Windows'/><category term='Linux vs Windows'/><category term='Open Office'/><category term='Open Source'/><title type='text'>Free Web Software Reviews</title><subtitle type='html'>This blog is about my passion- free software. I had started with Windows freeware, but now I hope to begin analysis of the Open Source and Free Software world.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>36</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2784432250915333288</id><published>2009-01-04T20:32:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-04T20:53:19.219-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Anatomy of a malware scam: How everclipz.com infects people and evades the good guys</title><summary type='text'>Hundreds of thousands at risk dailyIn my previous posts, I have talked about malware downloaded from everclipz.com and how they keep the anti-malware vendors guessing. The downloaded malware is not detected by a majority of the anti-virus software. Also of interest is how the site operates, since it gives us knowledge as to how malware distribution actually works.How is the attack carried out: </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2784432250915333288' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2784432250915333288'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2784432250915333288'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2009/01/anatomy-of-malware-scam-how.html' title='Anatomy of a malware scam: How everclipz.com infects people and evades the good guys'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-4360965092791108849</id><published>2009-01-04T14:03:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-04T17:31:42.205-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Malware Authors Present AntiMalware Vendors a Moving Target</title><summary type='text'>One Site, Four Days, Four Different Trojans      Analysis of the site everclipz.com provides a grim reminder of the challenges and limitations of anti-malware software. . (Warning:Please do not visit the site, it is potentially very very risky, downloading a variant of the Zlob trojan). I had first hit upon the site on the first of January, looking for an “additional media codec” to improve upon </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=4360965092791108849' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/4360965092791108849'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/4360965092791108849'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2009/01/malware-authors-presenting-antimalware.html' title='Malware Authors Present AntiMalware Vendors a Moving Target'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2443226948163764147</id><published>2009-01-02T06:54:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-03T10:18:08.126-08:00</updated><title type='text'>You do not have to pay extra for the best antivirus</title><summary type='text'>How to block any malware from entering Vista, for freeThe best antivirus on Windows Vista comes free, along with the operating system. Yes, I repeat, its true: the best solution for all spyware and viruses comes along with the operating system; you just have to unlock it. Just go to the control panel, click on user accounts, make a new standard account and enable strict parental controls in </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2443226948163764147' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2443226948163764147'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2443226948163764147'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2009/01/you-do-not-have-to-pay-extra-for-best.html' title='You do not have to pay extra for the best antivirus'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-7421700732403551239</id><published>2009-01-02T04:14:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-02T06:48:48.616-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Anti-virus'/><title type='text'>Which is the best Free Anti-Virus for Windows</title><summary type='text'>Home users have quite a few options for free anti-viruses. Which is the best anti-virus among them? To answer this question, we first have to ask: What makes a good antivirus?A good anti-virus must have :A very good detection rate for viruses and trojans.Additional antispyware/ anti-rootkit capabilityLesser number of false-positivesUse less system resources so that there is no performance </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=7421700732403551239' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/7421700732403551239'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/7421700732403551239'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2009/01/which-is-best-free-anti-virus-for.html' title='Which is the best Free Anti-Virus for Windows'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-3556735429460314153</id><published>2008-12-19T10:18:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-20T05:59:15.107-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Misleading Vulnerability Counts in the Browser Wars</title><summary type='text'>Getting Behind the Raw Numbers         A lot of noise has been made recently about the inclusion of Firefox among the most vulnerable programs on Windows. Certainly, amongst the browsers, it has the dubious distinction of being most hit by vulnerabilities. What is the reason behind this? Is it due to the browser being so buggy that external researchers can find vulnerabilities very easily, or is </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=3556735429460314153' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/3556735429460314153'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/3556735429460314153'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/12/misleading-vulnerability-counts-in.html' title='Misleading Vulnerability Counts in the Browser Wars'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-9206046123727951194</id><published>2008-02-08T06:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-02-08T06:26:59.183-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>              For the last few days, I have been in a totally grumpy mood. First, I see an article in a computer magazine Digit comparing the security of Linux with Vista and come to the conclusion that both are equally secure but if things go wrong, they will go more wrong in Vista. Hello Digit, can you get off the fence please? On one hand, you give reasons why Linux is more secure, explain the</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=9206046123727951194' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/9206046123727951194'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/9206046123727951194'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/02/for-last-few-days-i-have-been-in.html' title=''/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-6558377745078932743</id><published>2008-02-05T11:43:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-08T15:43:56.443-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source Software'/><title type='text'>The eyeOS: A Review</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--   @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in }   P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }  --&gt;body { border: 0px; font-family:verdana; font-size :10pt; background-color :#FFFFFF; margin:0% 10% 0% 10%;}table { font-size: 10pt;} p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; }The eyeOS has been making ripples among enthusiasts of “cloud” computing. It intends to serve as an Operating System which can be accessed </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=6558377745078932743' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6558377745078932743'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6558377745078932743'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/02/eyeos-review.html' title='The eyeOS: A Review'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R6i_tYHYj2I/AAAAAAAACyg/1ebzSLuirzI/s72-c/appseye.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-5819974645303557831</id><published>2008-02-03T15:04:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T15:19:35.349-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>Popularizing Linux: Are Flash based Distros underutilized?</title><summary type='text'>I have often thought why Linux is not more popular. Mostly, it is usable, more secure and less costly than Windows. Why, then, do more people not use Linux? Disregarding, for the time being, the general ignorance of the people,I think the following points are very relevant:It is a Windows world: Most of the applications that people use are Windows specific proprietary programs. The most commonly </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=5819974645303557831' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5819974645303557831'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5819974645303557831'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/02/popularizing-linux-are-flash-based.html' title='Popularizing Linux: Are Flash based Distros underutilized?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-680134028193015635</id><published>2008-01-26T13:53:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-26T14:28:11.761-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Internet Explorer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>The Safest Version of Internet Explorer Yet?</title><summary type='text'>Evidence:Tried to install spyware: Failed              Tried out proof of concepts of some known vulnerabilities: Failed             Tried out ActiveX: Failed</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=680134028193015635' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/680134028193015635'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/680134028193015635'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/safest-version-of-internet-explorer-yet.html' title='The Safest Version of Internet Explorer Yet?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R5uzyYHYj1I/AAAAAAAACx8/40sLyiiZHKs/s72-c/snapshot7.png%7E' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2300214886889493782</id><published>2008-01-25T05:19:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-25T05:38:37.642-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux vs Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='FUD'/><title type='text'>Jeff Jones at it again</title><summary type='text'>When will the half truths of Microsoft end? While reading ZDNet, I came across a blog post stating that Jeff Jones, security director of Microsoft has again published a flawed study in which he compares the total security counts of Vista in its first year vs those of Linux distributions in their first year.Of course, he does not mention how many of those were high risk, and how many low risk. </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2300214886889493782' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2300214886889493782'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2300214886889493782'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/jeff-jones-at-it-again.html' title='Jeff Jones at it again'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-3423897949579340788</id><published>2008-01-24T12:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-24T13:53:01.313-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>My encounter with a computer salesman (or justification of my obsession with FUD)</title><summary type='text'>Today, I went to an authorized dealer for HCL computers. I was interested in their offering of a mini-laptop just like the Asus EEE-PC, and was slightly cheaper to boot (costing about 14,000 Rs + taxes for the 2 GB model  against Rs 15, 900 approx for the ASUS EEE PC 4 GB model; I intendedto use a 2GB pen drive to make up for the difference in storage) . I also had to help a colleague of mine </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=3423897949579340788' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/3423897949579340788'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/3423897949579340788'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/my-encounter-with-computer-salesman-or.html' title='My encounter with a computer salesman (or justification of my obsession with FUD)'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-166334423139313316</id><published>2008-01-23T10:58:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-25T09:10:48.474-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='vulnerability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><title type='text'>Ten Common Security Myths</title><summary type='text'>While browsing and in discussion with friends, I have come across many misconceptions regarding security. Some of them are planted by the marketing division of software companies, some are the result of fanboyism and some are due to plain ignorance. The following are some of the most common:Myths regarding the OS:Windows  is insecure because of its popularity : Perhaps the most widely  repeated </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=166334423139313316' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/166334423139313316'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/166334423139313316'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/ten-common-security-myths.html' title='Ten Common Security Myths'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-1617806780357657350</id><published>2008-01-22T16:04:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-23T11:05:18.425-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux vs Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='vulnerability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Firefox'/><title type='text'>FUD from Techworld, and Secunia's numbers</title><summary type='text'>I came across an article in Techworld which discussed a Secunia report. The story ran with the title: "Red Hat and Firefox more buggy than Microsoft" . Now, on reading the report by Secunia, it is amply clear that the window of exploitation is lesser for Firefox, and Secunia also makes it clear that on a OS is to OS comparison, RedHat has far lesser bugs than Windows, with most of the security </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=1617806780357657350' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/1617806780357657350'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/1617806780357657350'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/fud-from-techworld-and-secunias-numbers.html' title='FUD from Techworld, and Secunia&apos;s numbers'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2575122527130708732</id><published>2008-01-21T09:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-23T11:04:20.305-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Sorry for not posting for a few days</title><summary type='text'>I have been quite busy with my work and have not been able to post for a few days. I am sorry for that. I will remain busy on till about the 25th of this month, and do not really think will be able to post anything before that. I apologize once again.NilotpalEdit: Made redundant by Techworld's FUD</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2575122527130708732' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2575122527130708732'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2575122527130708732'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/sorry-for-not-posting-for-few-days.html' title='Sorry for not posting for a few days'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-192789789546288746</id><published>2008-01-17T13:22:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-20T06:40:57.355-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Office'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Office vs MS Office'/><title type='text'>Does OpenOffice have an unfair notoriety as a performance hog?</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--   @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin-bottom: 0.02in }   P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }  --&gt;body { border: 0px; font-family:verdana; font-size :10pt; background-color :#FFFFFF; margin:0% 10% 0% 10%;}table { font-size: 10pt;} p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; }The OpenOffice.org Suite is an adequate office suite for many people. However, it has been dogged by the accusations of performance </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=192789789546288746' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/192789789546288746'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/192789789546288746'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/final.html' title='Does OpenOffice have an unfair notoriety as a performance hog?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-1899326449655969582</id><published>2008-01-14T22:42:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-08T15:43:56.767-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Office'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Office vs MS Office'/><title type='text'>MS Excel 2007 vs OOo Calc 2.3: Which is faster?</title><summary type='text'>&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;Nilotpal ChowdhuryNormalowner372008-01-15T01:27:00Z2008-01-15T06:35:00Z26803878329454912.00&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;false0 pt0 pt00falsefalsefalseEN-USX-NONEX-NONE0 pt0 ptMicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--   /* Font Definitions */   @font-face   {font-family:"MS Mincho";   panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;   mso-font-alt:"\FF2D\FF33 \</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=1899326449655969582' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/1899326449655969582'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/1899326449655969582'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/comparison-of-performance-of-ms-excel.html' title='MS Excel 2007 vs OOo Calc 2.3: Which is faster?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R4xYcvkfESI/AAAAAAAACwc/7RjMg6_mlGo/s72-c/excalc_html_3d4c5994.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2932441557406288321</id><published>2008-01-13T15:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-08T15:43:56.931-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Office'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Office vs MS Office'/><title type='text'>Open Office Writer 2.3 is Faster Than MS Word 2007</title><summary type='text'>The Open Office suite is seen as a capable alternative to MS Office. However, Open Office has been constantly criticized for being slow, with commentators likening it to a pig. To check out the truth behind this perception, I compared the performance of Microsoft Office 2007 with Open Office 2.3 on Windows XP SP2. First up, the word processing programs will be compared. Methodology: The startup </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2932441557406288321' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2932441557406288321'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2932441557406288321'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/open-office-writer-23-is-faster-than-ms.html' title='Open Office Writer 2.3 is Faster Than MS Word 2007'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R4qfHPkfEJI/AAAAAAAACu8/YI42pslktds/s72-c/MS+woed+vs+Ooffice_html_146cf09b.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-6955494780802761035</id><published>2008-01-12T22:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-04T17:30:26.041-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>Free Anti-virus comparisons, OS Comparisons and more</title><summary type='text'>Home users have quite a few options for free anti-viruses. Which is the best anti-virus among them? To answer this question, we first have to ask: What makes a good antivirus?A good anti-virus must have :A very good detection rate for viruses and trojans.Additional antispyware/ anti-rootkit capabilityLesser number of false-positivesUse less system resources so that there is no performance </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=6955494780802761035' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6955494780802761035'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6955494780802761035'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/free-anti-virus-comparisons-os.html' title='Free Anti-virus comparisons, OS Comparisons and more'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-8478486621419048198</id><published>2008-01-09T12:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.156-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>Open Source Software contains Security Holes: So What?</title><summary type='text'>I found a story in Information week "Open Source Code Contains Security Holes" and thought, what's new? Coverity found holes in common OSS. All software have holes. I really did not understand the point of the author- Was it OS bashing? In which case the number of holes have to compared with those of closed source alternatives. In fact, such a study by Coverity shows that Open Source is more </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=8478486621419048198' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/8478486621419048198'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/8478486621419048198'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/open-source-software-contains-security.html' title='Open Source Software contains Security Holes: So What?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-5069105029713950078</id><published>2008-01-08T13:23:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.156-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'> What are the killer features of Linux? The lack of a so called killer application is often given as an excuse for the low adoption of Linux on desktops. This argument surprises me, because I ceratinly have not found a singlr “Killer” application in Windows for the general user, with the exception of hardcore games, which does not have an equivalent in Linux. Maybe someone will enlighten me on </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=5069105029713950078' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5069105029713950078'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5069105029713950078'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/what-are-killer-features-of-linux-lack.html' title=''/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-5921805688947066850</id><published>2008-01-08T11:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.157-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>How Linux Can Help Windows Users There is a feeling that Linux and Windows are mutually incompatible, much like the protagonists of Rudyard Kipling's poem, which begins “East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet”. However, Linux, due to somew of its unique features like being able to run completely from RAM, may be of great help to Windows users. Here are some examples:   </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=5921805688947066850' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5921805688947066850'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5921805688947066850'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/how-linux-can-help-windows-users-there.html' title=''/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2658087735937620634</id><published>2008-01-06T12:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-06T13:23:06.138-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><title type='text'>Zero Day Exploits in 2007: Security Lessons Re-learned</title><summary type='text'>I made a search for zero day exploits affecting different systems from  eEye, Secunia, FrSirt, and US-CERT. I was not surprised to see Windows software leading the list of vulnerable software (It is the most popular platform after all, and older versions, including and prior to XP, not very secure). However, I was more interested in knowing about the mitigating factors, since my basic interest is</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2658087735937620634' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2658087735937620634'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2658087735937620634'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/zero-day-exploits-in-2007-security.html' title='Zero Day Exploits in 2007: Security Lessons Re-learned'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-7772627749496305255</id><published>2008-01-06T05:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.157-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>Reasons why Linux will not take off in India</title><summary type='text'>Many times, I have wondered why Free software is not making inroads in India.  And the main reason I think is piracy. Over here, most people buy an assembled system and get a pirated Windows XP and MS Office 2003 for free. Those who buy costly laptops also buy Windows, sure, but then they promptly get a pirated MS Office installed. Till now, the only genuine version of MS Office I have seen is </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=7772627749496305255' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/7772627749496305255'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/7772627749496305255'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/reasons-why-linux-will-not-take-off-in.html' title='Reasons why Linux will not take off in India'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-6101852550759546885</id><published>2008-01-04T10:32:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-11T08:37:39.384-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><title type='text'>Why Vulnerability Counts are a Poor Measure of Security</title><summary type='text'>No of vulnerabilities in 2007:   System A-62,   System B- 71                                                                  Quick, tell me which system is more secure, system A or system B?If you think that system B less secure, you should look at what those systems really are. System A represents a default installation of Windows XP Home for the year 2007, System B, XP Home with Kaspersky 6.x </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=6101852550759546885' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6101852550759546885'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6101852550759546885'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-vulnerability-counts-are-poor.html' title='Why Vulnerability Counts are a Poor Measure of Security'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R39Ry_kfEII/AAAAAAAACu0/DapHre4eOC8/s72-c/vulnerability+counts+flawed_html_m11edc7d0.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-420704590613446344</id><published>2008-01-03T05:36:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.158-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source Software'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>Why I am biased towards Free Software, and a New Years Resolution</title><summary type='text'>Some people have accused me of bias towards Open Source and Free Software, even going to the extent of calling me a fanboy. While I do think I am not a Open Source fanboy (two of my favorite apps are closed source -the Opera browser and Opera Mini), I do admit to a bias for Free Software.Why? Simple! They (Free Software) belong to me! They are my property the moment I downloaded it or bought it </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=420704590613446344' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/420704590613446344'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/420704590613446344'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-i-am-biased-towards-free-software.html' title='Why I am biased towards Free Software, and a New Years Resolution'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-6554766784314146510</id><published>2008-01-02T04:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.158-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Open Source'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><title type='text'>Is it possible to enumerate the ten best open source desktop applications?</title><summary type='text'>I came across a post today in Softpedia enumerating the top 10 open source applications. And the list has very good software: GIMP, Mplayer, Amarok, Pidgin, Wine, Open Office, K3B, Firefox, Thunderbird and Filezilla. However, many of these programs have very good open-source alternatives, some with more advanced features. That set me thinking about what, to me are the top ten open source programs</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=6554766784314146510' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6554766784314146510'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6554766784314146510'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/is-it-possible-to-enumerate-ten-best.html' title='Is it possible to enumerate the ten best open source desktop applications?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2638494550246989946</id><published>2007-12-20T09:33:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:49:32.076-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux vs Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><title type='text'>Why Linux is More Secure Than Windows</title><summary type='text'>  &lt;!--   @page { size: 8.5in 11in; margin: 0.79in }   P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }  --&gt;    In my last post, I showed how the vulnerability counts for Ubuntu Dapper LTS were lower than Windows Vista. However, I also mentioned that this should be used only to counter Microsoft FUD, and not as a measure of security. What, then, shows that Linux is actually more secure than Windows? To answer this, we</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2638494550246989946' title='114 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2638494550246989946'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2638494550246989946'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/12/why-linux-is-more-secure-than-windows.html' title='Why Linux is More Secure Than Windows'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>114</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-211136623408969387</id><published>2007-12-18T16:01:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:58:06.382-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Linux'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Windows'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='vulnerability'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><title type='text'>Ubuntu vs Vista Vulnerability Counts in 2007 : Destroying the FUD</title><summary type='text'>There has been a lot of FUD flying around stating that Microsoft Windows Vista is more secure compared to Linux. What has been actually compared are the number of vulnerabilities fixed, for a distribution of Linux and Windows Vista. Both 3 month and 6 month studies have been published, with the intention of showing Linux security in a poor light. Now, this is in no way an  apples to apples </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=211136623408969387' title='10 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/211136623408969387'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/211136623408969387'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/12/ubuntu-vs-vista-actual-operating-system.html' title='Ubuntu vs Vista Vulnerability Counts in 2007 : Destroying the FUD'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R2hiaPkfEGI/AAAAAAAACtw/Fa9dEbYD1FQ/s72-c/ubuntu+vs+Vista_html_m27e37cfa.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>10</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-6419960098506234823</id><published>2007-12-03T22:34:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-08T15:43:57.462-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Internet Explorer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Opera'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Firefox'/><title type='text'>Internet Explorer Shows Amazing Security Gains in 2007</title><summary type='text'>(..Ok, Opera finished as the safest browser, but that's nothing new)I have finished calculating the total number of risk-days (for those who want to know what risk-days is, read my earlier research) for browsers for the period January 2006 till now. Whew! And the surprising result is that Internet Explorer has improved markedly on the security front in 2007. When compared for the entire period of</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=6419960098506234823' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6419960098506234823'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6419960098506234823'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/12/internet-explorer-shows-amazing.html' title='Internet Explorer Shows Amazing Security Gains in 2007'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_2hdvn2c7rBw/R1T27MrYXSI/AAAAAAAACsk/TbW2lkQdaSs/s72-c/browsersecurity+comparison_html_m652254bd.gif' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-5825620075873622308</id><published>2007-12-02T11:45:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-03T04:26:51.139-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Internet Explorer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Microsoft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Firefox'/><title type='text'>Former Microsoft Security Strategist Says Microsoft Does Not Report All Security Issues</title><summary type='text'>Respected security strategist, Window Snyder, presently Head of Security Strategy at Microsoft and formerly senior security strategist at Microsoft and security lead and signoff on Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003, has mentioned that Microsoft does not publicly report security issues found internally. Rebutting the study comparing IE security to Firefox by one of the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=5825620075873622308' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5825620075873622308'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5825620075873622308'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/12/former-microsoft-security-strategist.html' title='Former Microsoft Security Strategist Says Microsoft Does Not Report All Security Issues'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-2090152877302332807</id><published>2007-11-30T15:46:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-14T23:56:43.159-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='random thoughts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Microsoft Security'/><title type='text'>The Microsoft FUD Machine cometh again: Firefox said to be less secure than Internet Explorer</title><summary type='text'>I had lost all interest in blogging, but the latest installment of FUD by Microsoft has made me again take it up. Jeff Jones , security guy at Microsoft has published a paper stating that Firefox has more number of unpatched vulnerabilities, and is more insecure. Now, I had done a small study a few months back comparing the vulnerabilities of the three major browsers on the Windows platform, and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=2090152877302332807' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2090152877302332807'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/2090152877302332807'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/11/microsoft-fud-machine-cometh-again.html' title='The Microsoft FUD Machine cometh again: Firefox said to be less secure than Internet Explorer'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-5691712857574327270</id><published>2007-03-08T09:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-01-03T04:41:24.274-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='GIMP'/><title type='text'>GIMP: The best image editing software for home users</title><summary type='text'>GIMP is the best image editing software for amateurs and home users. You can download it here. You will also need a few tutorials, which you can get here. There has been a lot of arguments about which is better, the GIMP or Adobe photoshop. Philip McClure has done a nice analysis on GIMP vs Photoshop, and has found GIMP to be better for home users while the photoshop to be better for professional</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=5691712857574327270' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5691712857574327270'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/5691712857574327270'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/03/gimp-best-image-editing-software-for.html' title='GIMP: The best image editing software for home users'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-1157578331055959323</id><published>2007-02-25T09:57:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-25T09:58:17.606-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>ONLINE MALWARE SCANNERS, A GREAT COMPLEMENT TO YOUR ANTI-VIRUS  You have a good anti-virus, congratulations. You are conscientous about spyware and have included a good anti-spyware. Further congratulations. However, you have to remember that all anti-viruses will miss something, and there is no anti-spyware which gives 100% results. This fact was borne out to me when, inspite  using an </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=1157578331055959323' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/1157578331055959323'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/1157578331055959323'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/02/online-malware-scanners-great.html' title=''/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-7642131158013240593</id><published>2007-02-24T14:34:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-25T10:51:24.639-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>WHICH IS THE BEST FREE ANTI-VIRUS PROGRAM  There are 6 major anti-virus programs: AOL Active Virus Shield,  Avira AntiVir Personal Edition Classic, Bit Defender Free edition, Avast! Home edition, AVG Free edition and ClamWin. To compare between the best programs, we need to know the detection rates,  how the program affects the system speed, and the scanning speed. In this article, I will compare</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=7642131158013240593' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/7642131158013240593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/7642131158013240593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/02/which-is-best-free-anti-virus-program.html' title=''/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-6802476631653283479</id><published>2007-02-21T20:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-12-04T05:08:40.106-08:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>WHICH IS THE MOST SECURE BROWSER?Browser security is extremely important. It is one of the major ways by which a remote attack can be made on your system. Any important information on your system can be easily read by a malicious hacker if you are not careful. Therefore, browser security is of prime importance.There have been misguided, (and probably mischievous) attempts in the net to measure </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=6802476631653283479' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6802476631653283479'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/6802476631653283479'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/02/which-is-most-secure-browser-browser.html' title=''/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2914981476940797329.post-9154439131456603647</id><published>2007-02-19T08:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2007-02-21T23:12:26.172-08:00</updated><title type='text'>WHICH IS THE BEST BROWSER OF THEM ALL?</title><summary type='text'>WHICH IS THE BEST BROWSER OF THEM ALL?There has been numerous arguments as to which is the best browser, Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox or Opera. All three have their own strong points, making it very difficult to decide as to which is the best browser. Added to that are the differing philosophies behind the creation of each browser: Firefox has a simple default install and gives the owner </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2914981476940797329&amp;postID=9154439131456603647' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/9154439131456603647'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2914981476940797329/posts/default/9154439131456603647'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2007/02/which-is-best-browser-of-them-all.html' title='WHICH IS THE BEST BROWSER OF THEM ALL?'/><author><name>Nilotpal Chowdhury</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01328975362909831518</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
